[TriEmbed] Dash FCC info and model corrections

Shane Trent shanedtrent at gmail.com
Tue Jul 26 11:57:42 CDT 2016


Michael,

No, I stand corrected. The rev 2 Dash button is JK29LP! Just close enough
that reading the tiny print on the back of the button and then on the
screen looked similar! I look forward to seeing a tear-down of the AWS IoT
button!

Shane

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:55 PM Shane Trent <shanedtrent at gmail.com> wrote:

> Michael,
>
> My AWS IoT button has Model No. JK76PL on the back which is the same as
> the Rev 2 Dash Button. So expect they have the same internals. But at $20 a
> pop I am not ready to open this one to see.
>
> Shane
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:39 PM Michael Monaghan <mike at chipworks.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Shane,
>>
>> If I understand correctly the Amazon IoT button has different hardware
>> than the Dash button, including a "user replaceable" battery.  The firmware
>> is a bit different as well.  Of course at $20 a pop, one has a little
>> different expectations.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Shane Trent via TriEmbed <
>> triembed at triembed.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Amazon's IoT Service claims that the Dash Button is good for 1000
>>> presses.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:34 PM Pete Soper via TriEmbed <
>>> triembed at triembed.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> After taking one apart from the "top down" I'm pretty sure the bottom
>>>> plastic of a rev 2 can be cut away with no affect on the usability, but
>>>> exposing the battery holder for easy replacements. You would do this right
>>>> after the first battery pooped out. :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Pete
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 07/25/2016 09:07 AM, Shane Trent wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Great Dash Button tear-down with information about the rev2 design with
>>>> Atmel chip. I seems that rev2 has a low capacity battery but should last
>>>> twice as many button pushes (500 vs 250) because each transmit is shorter
>>>> so it uses less power.
>>>>
>>>> https://mpetroff.net/2016/07/new-amazon-dash-button-teardown-jk29lp/
>>>>
>>>> Shane
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 9:38 PM Pete Soper via TriEmbed <
>>>> triembed at triembed.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I mistakenly wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>    (playdoh are 29s, solidgold, gatorade, and chlorox are 76s). I took
>>>>> one of the heavier
>>>>>
>>>>> This is backwards. My playdoh ones are model 76 and the others 29. But
>>>>> with the move to "rev 2" it's likely random whether you get one or the
>>>>> other, with the 76 only in the less popular buttons that haven't turned
>>>>> over, I would guess.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, my search of the FCC records was messed up. The JK76PL rev 1
>>>>> files are here
>>>>> <https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=wU3P4tmvvtCJ8RtayC%2Fi9w%3D%3D&fcc_id=2ACBE-0610>
>>>>> and the JK29LP rev 2 here
>>>>> <https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=dxg92UFnj11r21%2BxCAQtiQ%3D%3D&fcc_id=2AETK-1013>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> -Pete
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list
>>>>> TriEmbed at triembed.org
>>>>> http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
>>>>> TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list
>>>> TriEmbed at triembed.org
>>>> http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
>>>> TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list
>>> TriEmbed at triembed.org
>>> http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
>>> TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org
>>>
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.triembed.org/pipermail/triembed_triembed.org/attachments/20160726/21b07329/attachment.htm>


More information about the TriEmbed mailing list