[TriEmbed] Dash FCC info and model corrections

[Shane Trent]

Michael,

My AWS IoT button has Model No. JK76PL on the back which is the same as the
Rev 2 Dash Button. So expect they have the same internals. But at $20 a pop
I am not ready to open this one to see.

Shane

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:39 PM Michael Monaghan <mike at chipworks.net>
wrote:

> Shane,
>
> If I understand correctly the Amazon IoT button has different hardware
> than the Dash button, including a "user replaceable" battery.  The firmware
> is a bit different as well.  Of course at $20 a pop, one has a little
> different expectations.
>
> Mike
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Shane Trent via TriEmbed <
> triembed at triembed.org> wrote:
>
>> Amazon's IoT Service claims that the Dash Button is good for 1000 presses.
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:34 PM Pete Soper via TriEmbed <
>> triembed at triembed.org> wrote:
>>
>>> After taking one apart from the "top down" I'm pretty sure the bottom
>>> plastic of a rev 2 can be cut away with no affect on the usability, but
>>> exposing the battery holder for easy replacements. You would do this right
>>> after the first battery pooped out. :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> -Pete
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/25/2016 09:07 AM, Shane Trent wrote:
>>>
>>> Great Dash Button tear-down with information about the rev2 design with
>>> Atmel chip. I seems that rev2 has a low capacity battery but should last
>>> twice as many button pushes (500 vs 250) because each transmit is shorter
>>> so it uses less power.
>>>
>>> https://mpetroff.net/2016/07/new-amazon-dash-button-teardown-jk29lp/
>>>
>>> Shane
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 9:38 PM Pete Soper via TriEmbed <
>>> triembed at triembed.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I mistakenly wrote:
>>>>
>>>>    (playdoh are 29s, solidgold, gatorade, and chlorox are 76s). I took
>>>> one of the heavier
>>>>
>>>> This is backwards. My playdoh ones are model 76 and the others 29. But
>>>> with the move to "rev 2" it's likely random whether you get one or the
>>>> other, with the 76 only in the less popular buttons that haven't turned
>>>> over, I would guess.
>>>>
>>>> Also, my search of the FCC records was messed up. The JK76PL rev 1
>>>> files are here
>>>> <https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=wU3P4tmvvtCJ8RtayC%2Fi9w%3D%3D&fcc_id=2ACBE-0610>
>>>> and the JK29LP rev 2 here
>>>> <https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=dxg92UFnj11r21%2BxCAQtiQ%3D%3D&fcc_id=2AETK-1013>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> -Pete
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list
>>>> TriEmbed at triembed.org
>>>> http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
>>>> TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list
>>> TriEmbed at triembed.org
>>> http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
>>> TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list
>> TriEmbed at triembed.org
>> http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
>> TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.triembed.org/pipermail/triembed_triembed.org/attachments/20160726/3ebca56f/attachment.htm>