<div dir="ltr">Michael,<div><br></div><div>No, I stand corrected. The rev 2 Dash button is JK29LP! Just close enough that reading the tiny print on the back of the button and then on the screen looked similar! I look forward to seeing a tear-down of the AWS IoT button!<div><br></div><div>Shane</div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:55 PM Shane Trent <<a href="mailto:shanedtrent@gmail.com">shanedtrent@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Michael,<div><br></div><div>My AWS IoT button has Model No. JK76PL on the back which is the same as the Rev 2 Dash Button. So expect they have the same internals. But at $20 a pop I am not ready to open this one to see.</div></div><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div>Shane</div></div><div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:39 PM Michael Monaghan <<a href="mailto:mike@chipworks.net" target="_blank">mike@chipworks.net</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Shane,<div><br></div><div>If I understand correctly the Amazon IoT button has different hardware than the Dash button, including a "user replaceable" battery. The firmware is a bit different as well. Of course at $20 a pop, one has a little different expectations.</div><div><br></div><div>Mike</div></div><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Shane Trent via TriEmbed <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:triembed@triembed.org" target="_blank">triembed@triembed.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Amazon's IoT Service claims that the Dash Button is good for 1000 presses.</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:34 PM Pete Soper via TriEmbed <<a href="mailto:triembed@triembed.org" target="_blank">triembed@triembed.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
After taking one apart from the "top down" I'm pretty sure the
bottom plastic of a rev 2 can be cut away with no affect on the
usability, but exposing the battery holder for easy replacements.
You would do this right after the first battery pooped out. :-)</div><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><br>
<br>
-Pete</div><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><br>
<br>
<div>On 07/25/2016 09:07 AM, Shane Trent
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Great Dash Button tear-down with information about
the rev2 design with Atmel chip. I seems that rev2 has a low
capacity battery but should last twice as many button pushes
(500 vs 250) because each transmit is shorter so it uses less
power.
<div><br>
</div>
<div><a href="https://mpetroff.net/2016/07/new-amazon-dash-button-teardown-jk29lp/" target="_blank">https://mpetroff.net/2016/07/new-amazon-dash-button-teardown-jk29lp/</a><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Shane</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 9:38 PM Pete Soper via
TriEmbed <<a href="mailto:triembed@triembed.org" target="_blank">triembed@triembed.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> I mistakenly wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"> (playdoh are 29s, solidgold,
gatorade, and chlorox are 76s). I took one of the heavier<br>
</blockquote>
This is backwards. My playdoh ones are model 76 and the
others 29. But with the move to "rev 2" it's likely random
whether you get one or the other, with the 76 only in the
less popular buttons that haven't turned over, I would
guess.<br>
<br>
Also, my search of the FCC records was messed up. The <a href="https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=wU3P4tmvvtCJ8RtayC%2Fi9w%3D%3D&fcc_id=2ACBE-0610" target="_blank">JK76PL rev 1 files are here</a> and the <a href="https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=dxg92UFnj11r21%2BxCAQtiQ%3D%3D&fcc_id=2AETK-1013" target="_blank">JK29LP rev 2 here</a>.<br>
<br>
-Pete<br>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:TriEmbed@triembed.org" target="_blank">TriEmbed@triembed.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org</a><br>
TriEmbed web site: <a href="http://TriEmbed.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://TriEmbed.org</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:TriEmbed@triembed.org" target="_blank">TriEmbed@triembed.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org</a><br>
TriEmbed web site: <a href="http://TriEmbed.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://TriEmbed.org</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:TriEmbed@triembed.org" target="_blank">TriEmbed@triembed.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org</a><br>
TriEmbed web site: <a href="http://TriEmbed.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://TriEmbed.org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></blockquote></div></div></blockquote></div>