[TriEmbed] Novel approach for low power logic from Intel
John Wettroth
jwet at mindspring.com
Tue Aug 29 10:51:27 CDT 2023
There are two general techniques under the heading of voltage scaling. DVS or dynamic voltage scaling does this in kind of an open loop way- vary the voltage and clock with kind of lookup table. AVS or adaptive voltage scaling is closed loop, they have a kind of a small model of the process on chip that they can play with V and F (like a ring oscillator driving a counter, etc.). This was called CPE, critical path emulation. We had a group at Maxim that was trying to do similar things in the analog/mixed signal domain. Current is just CVF + leakage. Leakage is generally small portion but at low frequencies becomes significant. You can play substrate tricks to reduce leakage, then its just C, V and F. You have more control of C than you’d think, you can turn off big blocks when not in use- V and F is what’s left.
Regards,
John M. Wettroth
E: jwet at mindspring.com
M: (919) 349-9875
H: (984) 329-5420
From: Peter Soper <pete at soper.us>
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 8:37 PM
To: Mike Lisanke <mikelisanke at gmail.com>
Cc: John Wettroth <jwet at mindspring.com>; Triangle Embedded Interest Group <triembed at triembed.org>
Subject: Re: [TriEmbed] Novel approach for low power logic from Intel
The novelty to me was the frequency being varied across a 300X range as the PS voltage was varied across a 5X range on the fly. I'd heard of very low supply voltages but not the dynamism.
Pete
Aug 28, 2023 8:32:49 PM Mike Lisanke <mikelisanke at gmail.com <mailto:mikelisanke at gmail.com> >:
Good catch on date!
I didn't understand because there's So Much Energy Harvest technology that running a chip on a solar cell (2 sq in?) seemed ridiculously easy to me.
I didn't read much further into the article thinking there was a mistake Or something unique. I don't know what size chip can boot/work with Just RF harvest but there's many.
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 8:15 PM Peter Soper via TriEmbed <triembed at triembed.org <mailto:triembed at triembed.org> > wrote:
Ugh. Sorry.
Aug 28, 2023 5:23:42 PM John Wettroth <jwet at mindspring.com <mailto:jwet at mindspring.com> >:
> Just noticed that the press release was from 2012- DOH! Oh well.
>
>
> Regards,
> John M. Wettroth
> E: jwet at mindspring.com <mailto:jwet at mindspring.com>
> M: (919) 349-9875
> H: (984) 329-5420
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TriEmbed <triembed-bounces at triembed.org <mailto:triembed-bounces at triembed.org> > On Behalf Of John Wettroth via
> TriEmbed
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 4:49 PM
> To: 'Pete soper' <pete at soper.us <mailto:pete at soper.us> >; 'Triangle Embedded Interest Group'
> <triembed at triembed.org <mailto:triembed at triembed.org> >
> Subject: Re: [TriEmbed] Novel approach for low power logic from Intel
>
> I'm surprised that Intel is claiming this as really novel. The Claremont
> Architecture mentioned was being talked about as the IA in 2012. It grew out of
> the Atom processors that ran in this near threshold/sub threshold region. Lot
> of companies have used techniques like this for decades. Most digital stuff
> that runs at these absurd low voltages is subthreshold or near. The very low
> power Microchip (nanoWatt XLP) parts use these techniques. Intel's FINFET
> operate below .7v already. There was a startup called SuVolta that was based on
> these techniques- it disappeared (acquired or folded?) about five years ago.
> Freescale had some dynamic power stuff that played games with the "body" or
> substrate connection to modulate threshold voltage. It let them make parts that
> operate in strong inversion at high speeds with higher class A type leakage
> currents but could downshift to a slower, low leakage mode by manipulating the
> body voltage. They could do this on the fly- don't know what happened to it-
> good fodder for ISSC conferences of the day. Press releases are written by
> investor relations guys that don't have a firm handle on the technology and
> mainly into promotion. Ironically, the old 40 or so nm process nodes were much
> better in these respects. I think 7 nm might have overshot the mark.
>
> Take Care-
>
> Regards,
> John M. Wettroth
> E: jwet at mindspring.com <mailto:jwet at mindspring.com>
> M: (919) 349-9875
> H: (984) 329-5420
>
> Searchable email archive available at
> https://www.mail-archive.com/triembed@triembed.org/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Triangle, NC Embedded Interest Group mailing list
>
> To post message: TriEmbed at triembed.org <mailto:TriEmbed at triembed.org>
> List info: http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
> TriEmbed web site: https://TriEmbed.org
> To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message:
> mailto:unsubscribe-TriEmbed at bitser.net <mailto:unsubscribe-TriEmbed at bitser.net> ?subject=unsubscribe
> Searchable email archive available at
> https://www.mail-archive.com/triembed@triembed.org/
_______________________________________________
Triangle, NC Embedded Interest Group mailing list
To post message: TriEmbed at triembed.org <mailto:TriEmbed at triembed.org>
List info: http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
TriEmbed web site: https://TriEmbed.org
To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message: mailto:unsubscribe-TriEmbed at bitser.net <mailto:unsubscribe-TriEmbed at bitser.net> ?subject=unsubscribe
Searchable email archive available at https://www.mail-archive.com/triembed@triembed.org/
--
Best regards, Mike
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.triembed.org/pipermail/triembed_triembed.org/attachments/20230829/2208b7da/attachment.htm>
More information about the TriEmbed
mailing list