[TriEmbed] Dash FCC info and model corrections
Pete Soper
pete at soper.us
Tue Jul 26 12:54:04 CDT 2016
Oh.
So the August 23 date is for *more* IoT buttons. I wasn't paying proper
attention. :-)
Based on what I know about FCC type certification if it says JK76PL, it
is the same as a Dash rev 2.
-Pete
On 07/26/2016 12:55 PM, Shane Trent wrote:
> Michael,
>
> My AWS IoT button has Model No. JK76PL on the back which is the same
> as the Rev 2 Dash Button. So expect they have the same internals. But
> at $20 a pop I am not ready to open this one to see.
>
> Shane
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:39 PM Michael Monaghan <mike at chipworks.net
> <mailto:mike at chipworks.net>> wrote:
>
> Shane,
>
> If I understand correctly the Amazon IoT button has different
> hardware than the Dash button, including a "user replaceable"
> battery. The firmware is a bit different as well. Of course at
> $20 a pop, one has a little different expectations.
>
> Mike
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Shane Trent via TriEmbed
> <triembed at triembed.org <mailto:triembed at triembed.org>> wrote:
>
> Amazon's IoT Service claims that the Dash Button is good for
> 1000 presses.
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:34 PM Pete Soper via TriEmbed
> <triembed at triembed.org <mailto:triembed at triembed.org>> wrote:
>
> After taking one apart from the "top down" I'm pretty sure
> the bottom plastic of a rev 2 can be cut away with no
> affect on the usability, but exposing the battery holder
> for easy replacements. You would do this right after the
> first battery pooped out. :-)
>
>
> -Pete
>
>
> On 07/25/2016 09:07 AM, Shane Trent wrote:
>> Great Dash Button tear-down with information about the
>> rev2 design with Atmel chip. I seems that rev2 has a low
>> capacity battery but should last twice as many button
>> pushes (500 vs 250) because each transmit is shorter so
>> it uses less power.
>>
>> https://mpetroff.net/2016/07/new-amazon-dash-button-teardown-jk29lp/
>>
>> Shane
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 9:38 PM Pete Soper via TriEmbed
>> <triembed at triembed.org <mailto:triembed at triembed.org>> wrote:
>>
>> I mistakenly wrote:
>>> (playdoh are 29s, solidgold, gatorade, and
>>> chlorox are 76s). I took one of the heavier
>> This is backwards. My playdoh ones are model 76 and
>> the others 29. But with the move to "rev 2" it's
>> likely random whether you get one or the other, with
>> the 76 only in the less popular buttons that haven't
>> turned over, I would guess.
>>
>> Also, my search of the FCC records was messed up. The
>> JK76PL rev 1 files are here
>> <https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=wU3P4tmvvtCJ8RtayC%2Fi9w%3D%3D&fcc_id=2ACBE-0610>
>> and the JK29LP rev 2 here
>> <https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=dxg92UFnj11r21%2BxCAQtiQ%3D%3D&fcc_id=2AETK-1013>.
>>
>> -Pete
>> _______________________________________________
>> Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list
>> TriEmbed at triembed.org <mailto:TriEmbed at triembed.org>
>> http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
>> TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list
> TriEmbed at triembed.org <mailto:TriEmbed at triembed.org>
> http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
> TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list
> TriEmbed at triembed.org <mailto:TriEmbed at triembed.org>
> http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
> TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.triembed.org/pipermail/triembed_triembed.org/attachments/20160726/7df32059/attachment.htm>
More information about the TriEmbed
mailing list