[TriEmbed] recording Jitsi

[Pete Soper]

The Q&A below suggests recording Jitsi sessions is straight forward.

Can anybody translate this into terms of our current use of Jitsi for 
TriEmbed meetings? Is it feasible for us to use this with an expectation 
of reliability and practicality? If it would involve a fee to the folks 
running the server we're using now for a QOS (quality of service) 
agreement, does anybody know how much would it might be?

Does anybody have a sense of how many folks could be in a Jitsi meeting 
as we've been using it before the services cry uncle? My attendance has 
been too unreliable for me to have a sense of whether, for instance, 15 
is OK but 20 seems to be too much (if there have been 20).

Are their third party Jitsi service providers out there with definite 
QOS guarantees?

Finally, last year the strong rumor was that Firefox played better with 
Jitsi in terms of resource consumption as well as seamless operation 
compared to other browsers. Is there any data about this out and about?

-Pete

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.triembed.org/pipermail/triembed_triembed.org/attachments/20210118/98a5ccc8/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: lbabnejpgbacnnhk.png
Type: image/png
Size: 24743 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.triembed.org/pipermail/triembed_triembed.org/attachments/20210118/98a5ccc8/attachment.png>