<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>The Q&A below suggests recording Jitsi sessions is straight
forward.<br>
</p>
<p>Can anybody translate this into terms of our current use of Jitsi
for TriEmbed meetings? Is it feasible for us to use this with an
expectation of reliability and practicality? If it would involve a
fee to the folks running the server we're using now for a QOS
(quality of service) agreement, does anybody know how much would
it might be? <br>
</p>
<p>Does anybody have a sense of how many folks could be in a Jitsi
meeting as we've been using it before the services cry uncle? My
attendance has been too unreliable for me to have a sense of
whether, for instance, 15 is OK but 20 seems to be too much (if
there have been 20). <br>
</p>
<p>Are their third party Jitsi service providers out there with
definite QOS guarantees? <br>
</p>
<p>Finally, last year the strong rumor was that Firefox played
better with Jitsi in terms of resource consumption as well as
seamless operation compared to other browsers. Is there any data
about this out and about? <br>
</p>
<p>-Pete</p>
<p><img src="cid:part1.D98AF51F.FAE6B0AD@soper.us" alt=""></p>
</body>
</html>