[TriEmbed] old versions of Eagle?

[Pete Soper]

Have either of you done anything with version 4 yet? Any sense of how 
big a step change that's going to be?
And thanks for sharing these perspectives and details!
-Pete

On 01/26/2016 08:55 AM, Brian via TriEmbed wrote:
> On 1/25/2016 5:27 PM, Martin Brooke via TriEmbed wrote:
>> The separation of footprints from schematic parts all the time is 
>> annoying.
>>
>> Although I have seen reported it as a feature in that you can use any
>> part with any footprint!
>
> There's provision in the symbol library file for specifying matching 
> footprints.  I haven't
> fully exercised the feature yet, so can't say if it's really helpful 
> or not.
>
>
>> Guess I am overly biased against Eagle for having such a lousy academic
>> price for the full version!
>
> Completely with you there.  Or no price point between 160 mm x 100 mm 
> x 4 layers and 4 m x 4 m x 16 layers.  I think I would be happy paying 
> some prorated price and limiting myself to, say, /one/ square meter of 
> routing space...