[TriEmbed] old versions of Eagle?

[Brian]

On 1/25/2016 5:27 PM, Martin Brooke via TriEmbed wrote:
> The separation of footprints from schematic parts all the time is annoying.
>
> Although I have seen reported it as a feature in that you can use any
> part with any footprint!

There's provision in the symbol library file for specifying matching 
footprints.  I haven't
fully exercised the feature yet, so can't say if it's really helpful or not.


> Guess I am overly biased against Eagle for having such a lousy academic
> price for the full version!

Completely with you there.  Or no price point between 160 mm x 100 mm x 
4 layers and 4 m x 4 m x 16 layers.  I think I would be happy paying 
some prorated price and limiting myself to, say, /one/ square meter of 
routing space...