<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body>I think John meant for this to go to the list.<div><br></div><div style="font-size:100%;color:#000000"><!-- originalMessage --><div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: John Vaughters via TriEmbed <triembed@triembed.org> </div><div>Date: 1/10/18 9:01 AM (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: Pete Soper via TriEmbed <triembed@triembed.org> </div><div>Subject: Re: [TriEmbed] Atmega fast startup </div><div><br></div></div><br><br><br>Whether it is a reliable start or not, it is still interesting to find the limits and work from there.<br><br>John Vaughters<br><br><br><br>On Wednesday, January 10, 2018, 8:55:11 AM EST, Pete Soper via TriEmbed <triembed@triembed.org> wrote: <br><br><br><br><br><br>This was an experiment to see the best case cold start latency. I got it down to five machine instructions plus the internal startup of the on-chip oscillator so Shane and others in the discussion can see the answers to the questions left hanging: how fast the RC-based clock gets going and whether the latency tends to be deterministic. For one chip, one VCC and one temperature a half dozen repetitions suggest it is.<div>Pete<br dir="auto"><br dir="auto"></div></body></html>