[TriEmbed] Designing a brushless motor controller during the chip shortage
Pete Soper
pete at soper.us
Tue Oct 5 11:54:50 CDT 2021
I once got the idea I could control a brushless motor by being "clever"
controlling set of drivers. I was mistaken. Without some means of
sensing the behavior of the motor, whether it be back EMF or some other
feedback it's about 99% of hopeless. Which is to say I was too stubborn
to give up and managed to see the motor (from a server disk drive) spin,
but if I squinted at it there was misbehavior. A truly silly waste of time.
-Pete
On 10/5/21 12:45, R Radford via TriEmbed wrote:
> Carl, Charles is looking for a brushless controller, not just a DC
> motor driver. Brushless motors are closer to a stepper motor than a
> regular DC motor, but the 'steps' are controlled by sensing hall
> effect sensors to know when to step to keep the motor running smoothly.
>
> They are great as they have less mechanical issues over time (no
> brushes to replace) and also produce less electrical noise.
>
> The circuit you show is a nice DC to PWM circuit that is similar to
> one I did many years ago, but now most (all?) microprocessors have
> built in hardware assist PWM so that part is already handled. The
> first time I used a similar circuit was controlling a robot from a 286
> PC based robot where I used the parallel port to drive an R2R D/A
> circuit comparing against a triangle wave similar to your circuit. It
> worked great at the time, but now would not be needed. I still have
> that old hardware somewhere - perhaps I should pull it out and upgrade it.
>
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 12:02 PM Carl Nobile via TriEmbed
> <triembed at triembed.org> wrote:
>
> Charly,
>
> There are a few solutions to the controller problem. I designed an
> analog PWM circuit using op-amps and comparators that works great.
> You would also need an H-Bridge you would then need just one MCU
> board to control the PWM circuits then then control the H-Bridge
> circuits.
> My design is at: https://github.com/cnobile2012/VoltageControlledPWM
> My motors are fairly low current and voltage so the H-Bridges I'm
> using won't work for you, however MPJA.com has one in the link
> below, that will handle higher currents.
> https://www.mpja.com/Dual-H-Bridge-DC-Motor-Driver/productinfo/35567+MP/
> It will handle two motors and is only $22.95 ea. They give
> full docs on their site.
> My PWM board shou interface with it fine.
>
> ~Carl
>
> On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 11:16 PM Charles West via TriEmbed
> <triembed at triembed.org> wrote:
>
> Hello all!
>
> For the past 5 years or so, I've been working on a open source
> low cost sidewalk delivery robot. The current draft
> (prototype picture:
> http://goodbot.ai/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=mk3draft1.jpg) has 4
> hoverboard style motors in a skid steer arrangement. Each
> robot will need 4 motor controllers, which is one the big cost
> drivers right now (even prior to the covid shortage, the
> controller cost more than the motors).
>
> My last stab at designing a brushless motor controller failed
> spectacularly and the covid parts shortage has also made the
> central parts of that design completely unavailable. In
> addition, the bulk price for the motor controllers I've been
> using jumped from $56 per to ~$100 per.
>
> Given that, I thought it might be time to get back to the
> drawing board. However, I am not an expert at this sort of
> thing, so I thought it might be good to post what I am
> thinking and see if I am completely off the reservation.
>
> I'm currently using off-brand VESC motor controllers
> (schematic for normal ones here:
> https://vesc-project.com/sites/default/files/Benjamin%20Posts/VESC_6.pdf).
> They are great but do way more than I need. They can handle
> sensored and sensorless motors and be reconfigured with MANY
> different options using a desktop application. I don't need
> to make something that is easy to make work for lots of
> different motors and I don't need to support sensorless
> operation. I just need to make something that works for my
> motors.
>
> The approach that the VESC takes is a central microcontroller
> which talks with a (not currently available) DRV8301 chip.
> This chip in turn senses voltage/current across each motor
> coil and drives 6 N-channel mosfets to control the motor (3
> high side, 3 low side). It does FOC control, which I believe
> is state of the art in terms of smooth motor control. It also
> integrates the 3 halls sensors that sensored motors have if
> they are available.
>
> I'm having trouble finding any of these 6 mosfet motor
> controller optimized gate drivers, so I am thinking that I
> will just get some high side/low side mosfet drivers (like
> maybe these:
> https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/STMicroelectronics/SRK2000A?qs=WHlX%252B%252B9%2FRwCG%2FkukabfLqA%3D%3D)
> and some nice mosfets. Particularly without dedicated chips
> being available, I'm not going to try to do current or voltage
> sensing. I am thinking that I would just PWM the 3 half
> bridges and try to do sinusoidal motor control using a STM32
> microcontroller to drive it and the hall sensors in the motors
> to estimate position relative to the coils.
>
> If I may ask, does this sound reasonable or am I totally off base?
>
> Thanks,
> Charlie
> _______________________________________________
> Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list
>
> To post message: TriEmbed at triembed.org
> List info:
> http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
> TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org <http://TriEmbed.org>
> To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message:
> mailto:unsubscribe-TriEmbed at bitser.net?subject=unsubscribe
>
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Carl J. Nobile (Software Engineer/API Design)
> carl.nobile at gmail.com
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list
>
> To post message: TriEmbed at triembed.org
> List info:
> http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
> TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org <http://TriEmbed.org>
> To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message:
> mailto:unsubscribe-TriEmbed at bitser.net?subject=unsubscribe
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list
>
> To post message:TriEmbed at triembed.org
> List info:http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
> TriEmbed web site:http://TriEmbed.org
> To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message:mailto:unsubscribe-TriEmbed at bitser.net?subject=unsubscribe
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.triembed.org/pipermail/triembed_triembed.org/attachments/20211005/38d513a4/attachment.htm>
More information about the TriEmbed
mailing list