[TriEmbed] nevermind Re: Best esp32 board w a few constraints

[Pete Soper]

Don't need help, thanks. The v0.01 board will be what it will be. Was 
flirting with dropping out of the fun zone but recovered. :-)

-Pete

On 11/15/21 13:47, Pete Soper via TriEmbed wrote:
>
> Thanks again, Josh. I appreciate it. Got to go with the Adafruit 
> huzzah lib 'cause of time. Actually, I'm in trouble and need 
> somebody(s)  good with Eagle to swing by and help if possible. I was 
> expecting OSH Park to say I could get it to them tomorrow. Another 
> mistake.
>
> -Pete
>
> 919 270 9433
>
>
>
> On 11/15/21 13:39, Josh Wyatt wrote:
>> Negative on the eagle, I apologize.
>>
>> But I found these:
>> https://grabcad.com/library/mh-et-esp32-d1-mini-eagle-1
>> https://easyeda.com/search?wd=esp+wemos&indextype=components 
>> <https://easyeda.com/search?wd=esp+wemos&indextype=components>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Josh
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 1:30 PM Pete Soper <pete at soper.us> wrote:
>>
>>     Sorry for the confusion. Do you have an Eagle lib for this? Have
>>     to upload to OSH Park by 6pm.
>>
>>     THANKS!
>>
>>     Pete
>>
>>     On 11/15/21 13:21, Josh Wyatt wrote:
>>>     The link I shared was for ESP32 boards. What I was trying to
>>>     convey (and maybe was miscommunicated, yay email!) is that these
>>>     linked ESP32 boards seem to follow a form factor and convention
>>>     of prior/historical ESP8266 boards, and therefore bring some
>>>     additional consistency. I attached a screenshot of the page that
>>>     loads for me, from that Amazon link.
>>>
>>>     Thanks,
>>>     Josh
>>>
>>>     On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 1:16 PM Peter Soper <pete at soper.us> wrote:
>>>
>>>         Thanks very much, Josh. Agree with point about pin
>>>         conflicts. But did i go to the wrong page? I want to use an
>>>         esp32 not 8266. This is for the "0.01" versuon of the
>>>         community project board.
>>>
>>>         Nov 15, 2021 1:11:29 PM Josh Wyatt <dragojdw at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>             This is sort of an indirect response to your question,
>>>             but my experience is that the more complex and
>>>             "featured" the dev board, the less consistent. For
>>>             example, for boards with onboard 18650 battery holders
>>>             and Liion charger, OLED display, and even onboard LEDs
>>>             will be on different I/O ports. So my guidance would be
>>>             to choose the simplest boards available, which is sort
>>>             of antithetical to the "dev board" concept.
>>>
>>>             I've had pretty good luck with consistency on the "wemos
>>>             esp8266 clone" boards, presumably because the Wemos D1
>>>             mini became very established with the 8266; search on
>>>             amazon for "esp32 d1 mini." Here's a link:
>>>             https://www.amazon.com/Bluetooth-Internet-Development-Functional-Ardu-ino/dp/B08MFCC4SR/?th=1
>>>
>>>
>>>             You mentioned soldering footprint, and that one's not
>>>             super friendly; but it should be pretty consistent since
>>>             the design tries to adhere to the original ESP8266 Wemos
>>>             D1 Mini form factor.
>>>
>>>             You mentioned Amazon specifically, so I assume you're
>>>             prototyping?
>>>
>>>             Thanks,
>>>             Josh
>>>
>>>             On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 11:38 AM Peter Soper via
>>>             TriEmbed <triembed at triembed.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>                 What esp32 dev board soldering footprint should be
>>>                 used on a board combining this with other stuff
>>>                 where it has to be 1) obtainable reliably 2) offer
>>>                 wifi and BT and 3) be cheap? I see many cheap on
>>>                 amazon. Are their pinouts de facto standard? And
>>>                 finally, anybody got an Eagle lib for this board? Or
>>>                 could you make and send me an .lbr for it?
>>>                 Thanks in advance.
>>>                 Pete
>>>                 _______________________________________________
>>>                 Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list
>>>
>>>                 To post message: TriEmbed at triembed.org
>>>                 List info:
>>>                 http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
>>>
>>>                 TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org
>>>                 <http://TriEmbed.org>
>>>                 To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message:
>>>                 mailto:unsubscribe-TriEmbed at bitser.net?subject=unsubscribe
>>>
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list
>
> To post message:TriEmbed at triembed.org
> List info:http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
> TriEmbed web site:http://TriEmbed.org
> To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message:mailto:unsubscribe-TriEmbed at bitser.net?subject=unsubscribe
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.triembed.org/pipermail/triembed_triembed.org/attachments/20211115/d628a91f/attachment.htm>