[TriEmbed] Suggestions Needed to Improve Quality / Reliability Re: TriEmbed Digest, Vol 44, Issue 27

Scott Hall scottghall1 at gmail.com
Wed Jan 25 10:30:50 CST 2017


On 01/25/2017 11:00 AM, Pete Soper via TriEmbed wrote:
> PS Had to trim this down to stay under the per-message limit. It's also very
> hard on folks reading this stuff on their phones to have to wade across
> fractional megabytes of redundancy. Everthing is in the archive (link at the
> bottom of every message).
>

It is always good practice, and used to be the email norm, to trim the
replied-to quote of the previous message to just the portion you are responding
to when you are replying.  Also, this is why we all used to respond to email
/after/ the quoted message, not before, like I am doing with this message. 
Replying before the quoted message was invented by Microsoft's Outlook because
Microsoft could not (or would not) quote the previous message as per RFC
standards.  Outlook invented the copy the whole thread for each reply -- NO! Let
your email reader handle that.

-- 
Scott G. Hall
Raleigh, NC, USA
ScottGHall1 at GMail.Com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.triembed.org/pipermail/triembed_triembed.org/attachments/20170125/45327c02/attachment.htm>


More information about the TriEmbed mailing list